Author summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael E. O'Hanlon results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 807 hits . Analysis detected 11,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,274 of 9,282 authors). This Michael E. O'Hanlon is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Michael E. O'Hanlon
Author details
Total words: 15,256
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst