Author summary
56%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W. results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,660 of 8,944 authors). This Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W. is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
60%Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W. (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos