Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Meggen Harris results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Recency Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 223 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,528 authors). This Meggen Harris is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Meggen Harris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Meggen Harris (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,180
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 14.0%14.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Author 14.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos