Author summary
33%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan McArdle results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 312 faulty-reasoning hits from 360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,297 of 8,795 authors). This Megan McArdle is worse (more manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Megan McArdle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Megan McArdle (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510085.3% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles360 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.9%16.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos