Author summary
89%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These McKenzie Beard results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 3,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,615 of 8,817 authors). This McKenzie Beard is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
McKenzie Beard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
82%McKenzie Beard (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos