Author summary
60%1 analyzed article/video1,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maxwell G. Burkey results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 667 hits. Analysis detected 4,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,031 of 9,471 authors). This Maxwell G. Burkey is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Maxwell G. Burkey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Maxwell G. Burkey (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,784
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos