Author summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Tani results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 382 hits . Analysis detected 2,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,629 of 8,706 authors). This Max Tani is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Max Tani
Author details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.3% 6.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst