Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Burns results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 1,703 hits . Analysis detected 12,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,646 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (883 of 8,803 authors). This Max Burns is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Max Burns
Author details
Total words: 5,646
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.0% percentile 5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.4% 19.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.2% 30.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 21.4% 21.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 15.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst