Author summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maureen Mullarkey results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 330 hits . Analysis detected 1,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,944 of 9,471 authors). This Maureen Mullarkey is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Maureen Mullarkey
Author details
Total words: 4,000
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst