Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Richmond results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,889 of 9,538 authors). This Matthew Richmond is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Matthew Richmond
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
7%Matthew Richmond (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos