Author summary
98% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cooper results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 5,753 hits . Analysis detected 25,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,708 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,120 of 9,213 authors). This Matthew Cooper is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Matthew Cooper
Author details
Total words: 14,708
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.1% 39.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst