Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matt McKnight results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 300 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,705 authors). This Matt McKnight is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matt McKnight
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Matt McKnight (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,708
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos