Author summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Glazebrook results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 824 hits . Analysis detected 7,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,732 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,531 of 8,970 authors). This Matt Glazebrook is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Matt Glazebrook
Author details
Total words: 14,732
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst