Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matt Burgess results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 659 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Matt Burgess is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matt Burgess
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Matt Burgess (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos