Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marylène GagnÊ Ph.D. results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (3,913 of 8,559 authors). This Marylène GagnÊ Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Marylène GagnÊ Ph.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠55%Marylène GagnÊ Ph.D. (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos