Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MARTHA SANCHEZ results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Unattributed Quote , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 292 hits . Analysis detected 867 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,734 of 8,707 authors). This MARTHA SANCHEZ is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. MARTHA SANCHEZ
Author details
Total words: 1,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 24.9% 24.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 24.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst