Author summary
14%2 analyzed articles/videos1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MARTHA BELLISLE — Associated Press results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,752 of 8,695 authors). This MARTHA BELLISLE — Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
MARTHA BELLISLE — Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
11%MARTHA BELLISLE — Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,252
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate