Author summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark S. Gold M.D. results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (5,294 of 9,468 authors). This Mark S. Gold M.D. is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Mark S. Gold M.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠45%Mark S. Gold M.D. (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,916
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos