Author summary
ā 36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark S. Gold M.D. results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 2,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 45% (5,294 of 9,468 authors). This Mark S. Gold M.D. is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Mark S. Gold M.D.
Author details
Total words: 4,916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst