Author summary
11%3 analyzed articles/videos597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Reynolds results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 834 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,618 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,067 of 9,471 authors). This Mark Reynolds is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Mark Reynolds
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%Mark Reynolds (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,618
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.7%3.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 1.9%1.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate