Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 437 hits . Analysis detected 1,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,113 of 8,817 authors). This MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. MARK BANCHEREAU Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst