Author summary
83%1 analyzed article/video995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mario Nicolais results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 4,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,195 of 8,706 authors). This Mario Nicolais is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Mario Nicolais
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
64%Mario Nicolais (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos