Author summary
22%2 analyzed articles/videos2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariana Martínez Barba results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 3,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (8,296 of 9,438 authors). This Mariana Martínez Barba is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Mariana Martínez Barba
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
13%Mariana Martínez Barba (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,308
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510012.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos