Author summary
93% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These María Teresita Armstrong-Matta results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 6,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,289 of 9,458 authors). This María Teresita Armstrong-Matta is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. María Teresita Armstrong-Matta
Author details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst