Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Temming results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 153 hits . Analysis detected 1,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,620 of 8,788 authors). This Maria Temming is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Maria Temming
Author details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst