Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video1,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malcolm McMillan results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 2,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (6,662 of 8,524 authors). This Malcolm McMillan is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Malcolm McMillan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
22%Malcolm McMillan (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,944
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos