Author summary
â 92% 1 analyzed article/video 744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malachi Byrd results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 905 hits . Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of â 84% (1,567 of 9,538 authors). This Malachi Byrd is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Malachi Byrd
Author details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 30.4% 30.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.5% 11.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 30.4%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst