Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie LeBeau results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,436 of 9,471 authors). This Maggie LeBeau is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Maggie LeBeau
Author details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst