Author summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Halpert results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 582 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (2,506 of 8,709 authors). This Madeline Halpert is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Madeline Halpert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠72%Madeline Halpert (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,140
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos