Author summary
31% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucio Vasquez results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 4,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,024 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,199 of 9,229 authors). This Lucio Vasquez is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Lucio Vasquez
Author details
Total words: 9,024
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst