Author summary
17% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucia Preziosi results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 835 hits . Analysis detected 2,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (7,918 of 8,617 authors). This Lucia Preziosi is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Lucia Preziosi
Author details
Total words: 9,872
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst