Author summary
13% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lochlahn March results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 6,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,472 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (9,166 of 9,471 authors). This Lochlahn March is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Lochlahn March
Author details
Total words: 21,472
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 0.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst