Author summary
7% 1 analyzed article/video 1,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Shames results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 443 hits . Analysis detected 2,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 8% (8,803 of 9,471 authors). This Lisa Shames is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Lisa Shames
Author details
Total words: 7,744
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst