Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Mae Lazarus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 173 hits . Analysis detected 1,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,805 of 8,854 authors). This Lily Mae Lazarus is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Lily Mae Lazarus
Author details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% No True Scotsman: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Middle Ground: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst