Author summary
79%1 analyzed article/video269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Li Zhou results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 562 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 91% (910 of 9,471 authors). This Li Zhou is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Li Zhou
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
91%Li Zhou (selected)6%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.7%11.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 10.3%10.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos