Author summary
88%1 analyzed article/video273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leonardo Benassatto results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (979 of 8,870 authors). This Leonardo Benassatto is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Leonardo Benassatto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
89%Leonardo Benassatto (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,092
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 20.2%20.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 3.6%3.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos