Author summary
51%1 analyzed article/video276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawrence Bonk results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 919 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,850 of 8,706 authors). This Lawrence Bonk is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Lawrence Bonk
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
79%Lawrence Bonk (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,104
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos