Author summary
79%5 analyzed articles/videos559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Morganbesser results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 3,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,070 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,354 of 9,471 authors). This Lauren Morganbesser is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Lauren Morganbesser
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Lauren Morganbesser (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,070
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.3%10.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate