Author summary
27% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Sirikul results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 431 hits . Analysis detected 1,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,866 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,990 of 9,435 authors). This Laura Sirikul is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Laura Sirikul
Author details
Total words: 3,866
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst