Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lau Guzmán results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 327 hits . Analysis detected 1,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (4,109 of 9,471 authors). This Lau Guzmán is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Lau Guzmán
Author details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst