Author summary
51%7 analyzed articles/videos4,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lance Whitney results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,733 hits. Analysis detected 14,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,586 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,375 of 9,195 authors). This Lance Whitney is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Lance Whitney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
31%Lance Whitney (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,586
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate