Author summary
22%1 analyzed article/video828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Newman results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 1,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,843 of 8,561 authors). This Kyle Newman is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Kyle Newman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
44%Kyle Newman (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.2%9.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos