Author summary
99%3 analyzed articles/videos1,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurt Zindulka results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,404 hits. Analysis detected 13,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,768 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,394 of 9,201 authors). This Kurt Zindulka is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Kurt Zindulka
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
85%Kurt Zindulka (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,768
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.8%13.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.1%18.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.9%15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate