Author summary
ā 15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Zetter results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 379 hits . Analysis detected 2,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ā 13% (8,171 of 9,336 authors). This Kim Zetter is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Kim Zetter
Author details
Total words: 6,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst