Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Yup results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (7,142 of 9,430 authors). This Kayla Yup is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Kayla Yup
Author details
Total words: 3,964
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst