Author summary
91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Solino results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 2,692 hits . Analysis detected 8,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,676 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,673 of 8,706 authors). This Kayla Solino is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Kayla Solino
Author details
Total words: 8,676
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 31.0% 31.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 31.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst