Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Epstein results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Overconfidence Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 506 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,908 of 9,468 authors). This Kayla Epstein is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Kayla Epstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
17%Kayla Epstein (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,522
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos