Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katrina vanden Heuvel results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 1,441 hits. Analysis detected 8,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 91% (870 of 9,191 authors). This Katrina vanden Heuvel is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
91%Katrina vanden Heuvel (selected)6%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,960
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.4%36.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 14.7%14.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.9%15.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 7.8%7.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos