Author summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathleen Stock results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 2,953 hits . Analysis detected 19,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,729 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,492 of 9,435 authors). This Kathleen Stock is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Kathleen Stock
Author details
Total words: 17,729
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.7% 16.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst