Author summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Murphy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 540 hits . Analysis detected 6,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (7,129 of 9,471 authors). This Kate Murphy is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Kate Murphy
Author details
Total words: 11,896
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst