Author summary
34%1 analyzed article/video735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen E. Philbrick results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 747 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,977 of 9,471 authors). This Karen E. Philbrick is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Karen E. Philbrick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
48%Karen E. Philbrick (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,205
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos